New US-Cuba ties fuel bitter Havana Club rum trademark fight
MIAMI: With his tuxedo loosened and her dress slightly askew, the couple unwinding with cocktails in a new US ad for Bacardi’s Havana Club evokes the openness and decadence of pre-revolution Cuba that many exiles have longed for.
By contrast, an online gallery of portraits of employees at the distillery in Cuba of a rival brand of Havana Club jointly run by Pernod Ricard and the Cuban government shows Cubans proud to show the craft and heritage their country offers now, without looking back.
The fresh marketing campaigns for the two brands are the latest escalation in the liquor industry giants’ 20-year fight to secure the exclusive right to sell Havana Club throughout the US when the half-century-old embargo on Cuban goods ends.
Both Bacardi and Pernod Ricard hope to capitalize on consumers’ growing appreciation for premium rums, as well as U.S. excitement for easier travel to Cuba and its once-forbidden rum and cigars. Similar disputes typically are resolved by establishing who registered first, but this case is complicated and has been defined by bitterness between Cuba’s government and exiles.
After President Barack Obama announced a detente in December 2014, Pernod Ricard’s chairman and CEO said the thaw was good news for Cubans and Americans, and the company hopes to finally sell its Havana Club in the United States. Bacardi, privately held by its founding Cuban family, still seeks the rights to its own name in Cuba, a trademark it lost to Fidel Castro’s government.
Cuba registered its US trademark in 1976 and exported Havana Club mostly to Eastern Europe until a 1993 joint venture with Paris-based Pernod Ricard. Now it’s sold in over 120 countries — except the United States, the world’s biggest rum market.
US rum sales generated $2.3 billion in revenue for distillers last year, and premium brands meant for sipping are gaining on popular flavored and spiced rums, according to figures from the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States.
Bacardi produces its rums in Puerto Rico and Mexico, but the company argues that it’s been supplying the U.S. with Cuban rum for over a century.
It has sold its Havana Club in a handful of states since the mid-1990s. The new “golden age” ad campaign alluding to Bacardi’s past in Cuba is part of a nationwide rollout that includes a new, dark style of Havana Club.
Bacardi bought the name and a distillation formula handwritten from memory by the Arechabala family, who created the brand in Cuba in 1935 but lost control to Castro’s government in 1960. The company’s filings in federal lawsuits and trademark board appeals bristle with indignation while describing Castro’s troops forcibly confiscating the Arechabalas’ office property.
When Havana Club was acquired, then-Chairman Manuel Jorge Cutillas felt obligated to help the Arechabalas, who lacked facilities outside Cuba to sustain their business, said Rick Wilson, Bacardi’s senior vice president of corporate affairs.
“I remember him in particular saying that it was important that we were going to help this family so that all of their assets were not taken outside of Cuba,” Wilson said in an interview in Bacardi’s suburban Miami offices.
In court documents, Bacardi describes the rum produced by its competitor as “ersatz Havana Club.” Pernod Ricard’s general counsel, Ian FitzSimons, scoffed at Bacardi’s labeling of rum distilled in Puerto Rico as Cuban in any way.
“There’s a tradition of over 100 years of rum-making in Cuba, and we rely heavily on that. If you’re going to have a rum named Havana Club, it should be made in Cuba, and it should be made with Cuban products,” FitzSimons said by phone from Havana.
Havana Club’s sales, buoyed by promotions featuring Cuban artists and classic cocktails, totaled 4 million cases for the 2015 fiscal year, according to Pernod Ricard’s annual report that listed $9.7 billion overall in net sales.
Pernod Ricard is investing $90 million over the next few years to expand its operations in Cuba in preparation for the opening of the U.S. market, said Havana Club CEO Jerome Cottin-Bizonne.
Bermuda-based Bacardi doesn’t disclose its earnings, but its corporate responsibility report for the 2014 fiscal year tallied 60 million cases generating $4.477 billion in net sales. Court records show it paid $1.25 million to the Arechabalas for the Havana Club rights.
US courts generally have ruled against Cuba in this case, but the island’s government pursued renewal for its Havana Club registration, arguing that if the U.S. could not renew the trademark it also couldn’t cancel it under the embargo.
In spite of decades of icy relations, the US Patent and Trademark Office appeals board regularly declined Bacardi’s request to have Cuba’s registration canceled, saying it lacked the authority to answer Bacardi’s politically charged complaints.
A stalled federal lawsuit was revived when US trademark officials abruptly renewed Cuba’s trademark in January. Republican Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, echoing Cuban hard-liners in her Miami-area district, blasted the Obama administration for siding with Cuba over US business interests.
In its response to Bacardi’s latest legal challenge, Pernod Ricard and the Cuban government say the US trademark for Havana Club had been abandoned by its originators after Cuba “assumed managerial control” of the Arechabalas’ company.
Bacardi ultimately lost its claim to the Havana Club trademark in Spain after lengthy litigation there. The World Trade Organization also has sided with Cuba, saying the US violates multilateral trade rules with its regulations for cases involving assets seized by the island’sgovernment.
None of that matters, Wilson said, because only two companies run by the two Cuban families have ever sold rum labeled Havana Club in the US.
“Regardless of what happened with the registration, we have the common law rights. Cuba doesn’t,” Wilson said.